Skip to main content
6 minute read

User research on a budget: Running lean user research in pharma and healthcare

by Graphite Digital 20 May 24

User research is often seen as something that requires large budgets, long timelines and complex approvals.

In reality, even small studies can provide valuable insight that improves digital product decisions. 

In an ideal world, every digital product in healthcare and pharma would be shaped by extensive user research.

Teams would have the time and budget to explore multiple markets, speak with large numbers of users and run long-term studies that uncover every nuance of behaviour. In reality, digital projects rarely operate under those conditions.

Budgets are often constrained. Timelines can be tight. Compliance processes add complexity. In many organisations, research is one of the first activities to be reduced or postponed when delivery pressure increases.

The result is predictable. Teams rely on internal assumptions, stakeholder opinion or past experience when making product decisions. Digital tools are launched without fully understanding how people will use them.

Lean user research offers a more practical approach. Rather than aiming for perfect knowledge, lean research focuses on gathering enough insight to make better decisions while working within real-world constraints.

Why user research is often deprioritised

Most teams understand that user research is valuable in principle. The challenge is usually feasibility.

In pharma and healthcare organisations, research can be deprioritised for several reasons. Delivery timelines may be tight, leaving little room for activities that appear to slow progress. Access to healthcare professionals or patients can seem difficult. Some teams also assume that meaningful research requires large participant numbers and lengthy studies.

Compliance concerns can add another layer of hesitation. Teams may worry that speaking directly with users about digital products could create regulatory complications.

When research is framed as a large, complex undertaking, it becomes easy to postpone. Lean research helps reframe it as something manageable and achievable.

Some insight is always better than none

When research does not take place, decisions are rarely neutral.

Teams still make choices about features, content and workflows, but those decisions are based on internal assumptions rather than evidence. In these situations, the loudest voice in the room often carries the most influence.

Even a small number of conversations with real users can challenge these assumptions. Speaking with five healthcare professionals about how they complete a task can quickly reveal barriers or behaviours that were never considered internally.

Lean research is not about statistical certainty. It is about gaining directional insight that reduces the risk of making the wrong decisions.

What lean user research looks like in practice

Lean research focuses on learning the most important things as quickly as possible.

Rather than attempting to answer every question at once, the research is tightly scoped around specific decisions that need to be made.

In practice, this might involve a small set of interviews with healthcare professionals to understand how they currently access information, or a short round of usability testing to see whether clinicians can navigate a prototype efficiently.

These activities do not require large budgets or long timelines. In many cases, a small study can be planned, conducted and analysed within a matter of weeks.

The aim is not to prove a hypothesis beyond doubt, but to uncover patterns that inform better product decisions.

Start with the decision you need to make

One of the most common mistakes in research planning is starting with methods rather than questions.

Teams may begin by discussing interviews, surveys or usability testing without clearly defining what they are trying to learn.

Lean research works best when it begins with a decision.

For example:

  • Is this concept worth developing further?
  • Do healthcare professionals understand the value of this tool?
  • Where do users struggle within this workflow?

Framing research around a specific decision helps keep the study focused and ensures the findings will be directly useful to the product team.

Focus on moments that matter

Not every part of a digital experience carries equal weight.

Some interactions have a much greater impact on whether users adopt or abandon a product. In healthcare environments, these often include onboarding processes, key task workflows and moments where complex information needs to be interpreted quickly.

Lean research should prioritise these critical moments rather than attempting to analyse every element of a product.

By focusing on areas where friction has the greatest consequences, teams can achieve meaningful improvements without conducting large-scale studies.

Use the insight you already have

Many organisations already possess valuable information about their users without realising it.

Customer support queries, feedback from sales teams, interviews with internal stakeholders, medical information requests and analytics data can all reveal patterns about user behaviour and pain points.

While this information does not replace direct user research, it can help teams identify where deeper investigation is needed.

Combining existing internal insight with a small amount of qualitative research often provides enough context to guide product decisions.

Research can still be compliant

In regulated industries, teams sometimes assume that research activities will be difficult to approve.

In reality, many lean research methods focus on usability and digital experience rather than clinical or promotional topics. When research sessions are designed carefully and supported by appropriate consent processes, they can be conducted safely within regulatory guidelines.

In many cases, launching a digital product without testing it with real users carries greater risk than conducting responsible research.

Building a culture of continuous learning

One of the most valuable outcomes of lean research is cultural rather than methodological.

When teams see that research can be conducted quickly and efficiently, it becomes easier to incorporate it into everyday product development. Short research cycles help build familiarity with user insight and encourage teams to test assumptions before committing to large investments.

Over time, this creates a culture where learning from users becomes part of the normal development process rather than a rare activity reserved for major projects.

Improving digital experiences with user insight

At Graphite Digital, we work with healthcare and pharmaceutical organisations to design digital products grounded in real user insight.

Our research team regularly conducts studies with healthcare professionals and patients across therapy areas, helping organisations understand how people interact with digital tools in real healthcare environments.

If you're exploring how lean user research could support your digital products or services, we'd be happy to talk.

Get in touch with our team to discuss your project.

Want more on user research?

Boosting HCP engagement with strategic UX improvements

Conducting user research with ultra-rare disease patients to enhance the patient support programme

6 minute read

Designing with impact: Why aligning UX with business goals is a win-win in pharma

7 minute read

Conducting effective user research with healthcare professionals (HCPs)